Official websites use. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. Background Sociosexuality explains whether people hold an un restricted orientation toward casual sex, and its effects on well-being are inconclusive.
This study investigates how specifically the facets of sociosexuality relate to three components of well-being in men and women. Methods : Self-report measures of sociosexuality and well-being were assessed in Polish adults. Results : Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis revealed differences in sociosexual attitudes and desire across gender.
Structural equation models showed significant results only for menβemotional and psychological well-being were positively predicted by sociosexual behavior and negatively predicted by desire. Conclusions : Sociosexuality predicted well-being differently across gender. Sex outside romantic relationships casual sex is becoming more common in society, and scholars have consequently drawn more attention to the study of uncommitted sexual relationships e.
After years of studying well-being, research focused on three defining components of mental health: emotional, psychological and social well-being Keyes, Uncommitted sex has been typically linked to declines in general well-being; nevertheless, the study of the association of sociosexuality with specific types of well-being remains understudied. The current paper aims to resolve how the specific facets of sociosexuality relate to different components of well-being in men and women.
Sociosexuality describes the level of willingness to engage in uncommitted sexual relationships. Penke and Asendorpf proposed three distinguishable but correlated dimensions in sociosexuality: behavior, attitudes, and desire. Several theories provide accounts of gender differences in sexuality. Accordingly, gender differences in sociosexuality occur because men and women differ in their sexual strategies to ensure genetic transmission to future generations.
