Chris, honestly I think you are too negative about your photography. It does exactly what it needs to in showing us what the dishes more or less look like. Anyway, I cant really see a way around the light issues in restaurants unless you started using some huge SLR with low noise levels at high sensitivities or spend 6k on a Leica. Your words are more than descriptive enough :. The second photo down is literally the ugliest plate of food I've ever seen. It looks like a plate of slugs. Anyway Chris I do think you should mention that you got to have this dinner with my beautiful daughter siennamousepops.
The photography is fine for being shot on a phone. Photo 2 does look dodgy. I ate twice at Maze when Jason was in charge, wonderful,worth every penny.
PSSM seems hit and miss, I am not rich. My photos are similar. Not a bad post though. Style over substance in a few of these dishes. The pea dish looks the best. I had a pea mousse amuse bouche in Gordon Ramsay, one of the nicest things ever. Photo 2 , what is that all about? I am developing a real aversion to food blogs with far too many pictures.
The food will get COLD, idiots. I take one discrete, largely terrible snap with my Samsung IV, and I don't always get every dish. Not bothered. Don't want to be a pest. Like you, Chris, I feel the point of restaurant critiquing is to describe the food and the experience - not just present a scroll-through picture menu.
I hugely enjoy your reviews and your photography is perfectly fine! Chris, Don't be negative about your photography, although I am not a food photography but I feel these pictures reflects the deliciousness of the food.
