You have full access to this open access article. In complex hard rock terrain where the population suffers from water scarcity, the use of site-specific single-method surface geophysical surveys to prospect for groundwater is a common practise.
However, this has not completely solved the problem of drilling dry wells. To combat this failure, geospatial data and the analytical hierarchy process AHP are being used as supporting techniques to increase the chance of success. This study had the aim of generating a groundwater potential zones GWPZ map of the complex strato-volcanic terrain of Buea by integrating geospatial techniques, AHP, and the seismoelectric method.
Five factors influencing groundwater recharge were used to define the groundwater potential zones. Via the AHP and weighted overlay methods, five classes of groundwater potential zones were delineated: very poor, poor, moderate, good, and very good. More than half of the study area has good to very good groundwater potential. Lastly, the GWPZ model is validated with an iso-conductivity map from a seismoelectric survey and existing static water level data.
The iso-conductivity map revealed four main conductivity zones that correlate positively with the GWPZ map. The northwestern part of the study area is characterised by moderate groundwater potential, poor formation conductivity, and dry boreholes. There is an uneven distribution of groundwater and variable water table depth in the area. The results of this study are very encouraging, and the integrated approach used has proven to be efficient in determining groundwater potential zones in complex volcanic terrain.
The conductivities of the Younger and Recent basanites are very low, coinciding with moderate to poor groundwater potential and occurrence.
