
WEIGHT: 46 kg
Breast: 2
One HOUR:150$
NIGHT: +60$
Sex services: Uniforms, Fetish, TOY PLAY, 'A' Levels, Massage
Closed Mixed Outcome. Global Freedom of Expression is an academic initiative and therefore, we encourage you to share and republish excerpts of our content so long as they are not used for commercial purposes and you respect the following policy:. Attribution, copyright, and license information for media used by Global Freedom of Expression is available on our Credits page. However, the Court held that there had been no violation in respect of two further videos that had been secretly filmed on private premises.
The program included t hree videos that had been filmed with a hidden camera that showed: 1 A. On May 23, , the National Radio and Television Council held a hearing during which the broadcaster acknowledged the use of a hidden camera in the videos but argued that this was justified because A. The Council countered that if anyone was able to use a hidden camera by claiming that there was an overriding public interest in doing so, then all citizens β especially if they were public figures β would be exposed to the possibility of being subject to pressure and extortion.
The Council ordered the applicant to pay , euros for each of the two television shows during which the above-mentioned videos were shown, and to broadcast for three days in a row on its main news show the content of its decision. On April 4, , the applicant lodged an application for annulment before the Supreme Administrative Court and, on January 23, the case was referred to the Plenary Supreme Administrative Court because of its high importance.
The Supreme Court found that secretly video-recording a specific person constituted a violation of the right to personal image, as protected by Article 9 paragraph 1 of the Greek Constitution and Article 8 paragraph 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights ECHR. Therefore, the broadcasting of images gathered by secret means did not come within the legitimate exercise of the right to inform, because the news has been obtained violating an individual fundamental right. The Supreme Court dismissed the application for annulment accordingly.
The applicant company applied to the ECtHR alleging, inter alia , a violation of its right to freedom of expression.